[From nobody Mon Apr 20 16:47:33 2009 Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON@envmail.uwaterloo.ca> Received: from mailchk-m05.uwaterloo.ca (mailservices.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.128.141]) by envmail.uwaterloo.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n3KKgoPp025219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <gcmichal@envmail.uwaterloo.ca>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:42:51 -0400 Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.50.127]) by mailchk-m05.uwaterloo.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3KKdrj1003759 for <gcmichal@envmail.uwaterloo.ca>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:40:03 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2) id n3KKdata036737; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:36 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from MAILER-DAEMON) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca> Message-Id: <200904202039.n3KKdata036737@ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca> To: <gcmichal@envmail.uwaterloo.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary="n3KKdata036737.1240259976/ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca" Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) X-UUID: 8f315a7c-4049-4ed1-988b-9c531327200d X-Miltered: at mailchk-w03 with ID 49ECDDC7.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at mailchk-m05 with ID 49ECDD99.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95.1 at mailchk-w01 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mailchk-m05.uwaterloo.ca [129.97.128.232]); Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:40:04 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL, SARE_SPOOF_COM2COM,SARE_SPOOF_COM2OTH,SPOOF_COM2COM,SPOOF_COM2OTH autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mailchk-m05.uwaterloo.ca This is a MIME-encapsulated message --n3KKdata036737.1240259976/ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca The original message was received at Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:32 -0400 (EDT) from localhost.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- <grdenlists@wpirg.org> (reason: 550 no such address here) ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to ccjclearline.com.s7a1.psmtp.com.: >>> RCPT To:<grdenlists@wpirg.org> <<< 550 no such address here 550 5.1.1 <grdenlists@wpirg.org>... User unknown >>> DATA <<< 503 No recipients - psmtp --n3KKdata036737.1240259976/ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca Content-Type: message/delivery-status Reporting-MTA: dns; ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost.uwaterloo.ca Arrival-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:32 -0400 (EDT) Final-Recipient: RFC822; grdenlists@wpirg.org Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: DNS; ccjclearline.com.s7a1.psmtp.com Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 550 no such address here Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:35 -0400 (EDT) --n3KKdata036737.1240259976/ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca Content-Type: message/rfc822 Return-Path: <gcmichal@envmail.uwaterloo.ca> Received: from ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (localhost.uwaterloo.ca [127.0.0.1]) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n3KKdWta036729 for <grdenlists@wpirg.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gcmichal@envmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: (from www@localhost) by ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n3KKdRc0036728 for grdenlists@wpirg.org; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gcmichal@envmail.uwaterloo.ca) Received: from CPE0013f7fa221a-CM0013f7fa2216.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (CPE0013f7fa221a-CM0013f7fa2216.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.236.3.200]) by www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:27 -0400 Message-ID: <20090420163927.46024l5he1bmk60w@www.nexusmail.uwaterloo.ca> Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 16:39:27 -0400 From: gcmichal@envmail.uwaterloo.ca To: grdenlists@wpirg.org Subject: where to plant what MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.2) / FreeBSD-6.3 X-Originated-By: gcmichal@envmail.uwaterloo.ca X-Originating-IP: 99.236.3.200 X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_4_11; en) AppleWebKit/525.27.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.2.1 Safari/525.27.1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca I think the only major matter of concern is tomato blight, a soil-born =20 fungus. It wasn't very kind to us last year, one of the rainiest =20 summers on record, the same sort of conditions that produced the great =20 potato blight in Ireland that resulted in the terrible famine. It's =20 caused by a similar fungus. The tomato blight was a pretty general =20 problem throughout southern Ontario. The prescription given to =20 concerned gardeners on CBC's phone-in garden program is not to plant =20 the tomatoes in the same plot the year following blight. In our case =20 that would mean the two plots on the northeast side. Aside from that, =20 I don't think there is anything that makes rotation crucial, but it's =20 fun to rotate, and something is always discovered in varying planting =20 patterns. The artichokes didn't do very well because of the cool =20 temperatures and the shade from the trees on the west side, although I =20 think Maddy managed to develop a friendship with one of the few =20 chokes. I didn't start any artichokes this year. One thing we could =20 try is place the squash over on the east side or on the southern edge =20 and let the vines trail off over the adjoining weeds and lawn. Maintaining soil fertility is a good basis for rotation, but we know =20 little about our soil fertility because we haven't tested it. I =20 didn't see any signs of nutrient deficiency last year, such as =20 yellowish leaves or fruit that couldn't mature. The nasturtiums, =20 however, put out an impressive mass of foliage but relatively few =20 flowers. This usually means that the soil is rich and fertile, =20 because nasturtiums flower much better in nutrient-deficient soil. So =20 kick the nasturtiums over to what appears to be the most abject part =20 of the garden, if we have one, and they will thank us for it and =20 reward us with an impressive show of blooms. I think the fertility is =20 okay. I'd like to lop off some of the overhanging branches on the west side, =20 maybe even see if we can cut some of the trees down. Did any arugula get planted on the weekend? I had to take care of 30 =20 guests for Orthodox Easter and couldn't come out. The tomato plants I'm growing for the garden are now about 6 inches =20 high. I have them in sterile mix and containers. I leave for Japan =20 on May 4 and will need to find a home for them for about a week, =20 presuming that planting May 12-15 is not too early. Any suggestions? =20 I unfortunately lost all the pepper seedlings to a mouse. I came down =20 to my veggie "grow-op" set-up a few mornings ago and all the peppers =20 had been chewed off. The next day I trapped the mouse. The tomatoes =20 and basil were unharmed. It's a pity, because a number of the peppers =20 were Mexican varieties and I was looking forward to seeing them grow =20 and fruit. The groundhogs are out, but I only saw a roadkill, so that doesn't =20 really count. - Greg Michalenko --n3KKdata036737.1240259976/ecserv7.uwaterloo.ca-- ]